This is my proposed outline for a “library book” style game design book. I have written another book in a style to suit what I see as the primary audience, but there’s a place for a library/reference book as well. I’m interested in comments about what should (or should not) be included. After the outline there’s a detailed explanation of what’s going on here.
Title: “Guide to Video and Tabletop Game Design” or “Learning to Design video (and Tabletop) Games” or “How to Design Games”
Book Sections/Outline
The book will include many reference lists and explicated lists.
1. How to learn to design games
a. Objective: complete, Complete, COMPLETE the game
b. Start with the tabletop
c. Analysis of traditional games–often not what we want to emulate!
d. Learn a simple video game engine
e. Try to make simple video games
f. The impossibility of an individual making a AAA video game
g. Video games vs. tabletop games--differences and similarities
2. What is a game and what makes it good?
a. What is a “game”?
b. Characteristics of good games (Can it be well-designed and not attract its audience? No)
c. What makes a game epic?
d. What makes a game great?
e. What do games amount to?
f. Interaction in games
g. Types of challenges
3. The audience/target market
a. Styles of play
b. Convergence of tabletop and video games
c. Genres and game types
d. 21st century game characteristics
e. Hard core vs. casual gamers–characteristics
f. Replayability vs. repetition
4. The Process of Game Design
a. Ideas and origins of games
b. The key to successful games: iterative and incremental improvement
c. The design process diagrams (multiple explicated diagrams, in depth, both tabletop and video game)
d. The Nine Sub-Structures of games, with listings of most possible choices in each sub-structure (e.g., all categories of Victory conditions/Objectives, all categories of Economies, etc.)
e. Additional questions to ask yourself
5. Making a prototype
a. Comprehensive advice about making prototypes
b. Video game design documents
c. Lots of examples from my work
6. Playtesting and Modifying the Prototype
a. What to look for in the playtesters
b. What to look for in the play
c. Playtesting lists, questionnaires, Six Hats
d. When is it “done”?
7. Level Design (video and tabletop games)
a. Many lists from my level design classes
b. A level design editor’s advice
c. Examples of level design documents
8. Specific types of games
a. RPG (role-playing games)
b. CCG (collectible card games)
c. Board and card wargames
d. Miniatures games
e. MMOs (massively multiplayer online games)
f. Casual/”short experience” games
g. Social games (Facebook, etc.)
h. “Serious” games (education and training)
i. Others
9. Video game genres
a. List of genres including:
b. What is it
c. Who plays it
d. Salient features (types of challenges, settings)
10. Specific problems in game design
a. The three player problem
b. Fog of War
c. Cause vs. effect
d. Too much like work?
e. Flaws in multi-sided games (from TGC presentation)
f. Randomness, Chaos, and Manageable Variation
g. When do players score?
11. Marketing and the Law [or if space does not permit, leave this out as it is not strictly about design]
a. Making a video game pitch
b. Intellectual property
12. Resources
a. Books about game design (brief descriptions)
b. Software for VG production (brief descriptions)
c. Software for TT game production (brief descriptions)
d. Games you should know (brief descriptions)
e. Categorized list of tabletop and video game mechanics
f. Types of boards
g. Ways to use dice for combat
h. Online Resources (web sites, files, forums)
i. The International Game Developers Association (IDGA) Game Design curriculum suggestions
Example documents:
Video game concept documents
(There’s not room for a video game design document but I can certainly refer to ones I’ve found online)
Example of initial notes for a game (video and tabletop)
The game progress spreadsheet
Either I (at pulsiphergames.com) or the publisher will want to maintain a reference Web site for the book to update links and so forth.
Some explanation is called for. I have nearly completed a book about designing games (“Get it Done: Designing Games from Start to Finish”) that is quite different from the standard (video) game design books we see on the market. My original aim was a short book, the length of the average novel, rather than the typically-massive game design books. I begin with the premise that the best way to learn to design games, even if your long-term interest is only video games, is to design tabletop games. This is well-known to some teachers, especially to teachers who are game designers (video or tabletop). (Most game design books are not written by teachers.) The book is also very informal and inspirational in tone, as it is written with young (teen/20-something) wannabe designers in mind rather like the college and high school students I teach game design to. Considerable material from the book has been on GameCareerGuide and Gamasutra, the primary hangouts of video game professionals and wannabes, and seems to interest people quite a bit.
While lots of pictures and color are ideal for this audience, it can double the cost of the book. I’ve chosen to use only the mostly-noncolor illustrations and photos that make my point in order to keep the cost down. In the end a publisher may choose differently, of course.
If I cannot find a suitable traditional publisher for “Get it Done”, a low number of B&W illustrations will make the book much less expensive for POD (Publishing On Demand) distribution.
I have had interesting adventures looking for a publisher, as most video game design books evidently aren’t selling well in bookstores. This is hardly a surprise, as they’re too much long, too formal, and too much about analysis of games or about game production rather than about the activity of game design. This is just the kind of book that does NOT appeal to the audience I have aimed at. Some of them are written as textbooks, and the first thing to know about textbooks is that they’re often written to be forced on students by teachers who often don’t know a great deal about what they’re teaching, so the teacher wants the book to teach the course. I’ve tried to write a book someone would actually buy in a bookstore or online.
At any rate, when I recently proposed this book to a traditional library/scholarly publisher in my own state, they wanted me to change it to make it a “library book”. They want something that is a reference, that assumes the reader does not need any encouragement to read the book but instead is looking for information. So that person has gone to the library to seek out game design books. Presumably this will tend to be people who are in their late 20s and older, or who are very strongly motivated–a smaller audience than my first book is aimed at.
I’m presently preparing a proposal for this publisher, and I’d like to see what people think of it.
When I was young (1960s) I read tons of library books. Now, the average video game fan does NOT go to the library at all (not for books, anyway), and many of them rarely read non-fiction books of any kind (especially textbooks). My first book is designed to be attractively readable for people who rarely read books, who may even be of the “tl;dr” crowd (though there’s not a lot of hope there). Yet a “library book” can be written with the idea that the reader already has sufficient motivation/maturity to read the book. Again, this will be a short book of this type, novel length, with few if any photos and few illustrations.
So this kind of book can have lists and details that I would not put in the first, or that there is not room for (I’m 22% beyond my original target length in “Get it Done”). It can be comprehensive in the details it addresses, whereas “Get it Done” is intended to describe everything, but not in great detail because detail is not what the audience for that book needs or is looking for.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
First, thank you for your blog and other online postings. They are excellent.
Second, I vote for Get It Done. You are right in your assumption that there is a market for such a book. There are many young students who are eager to learn how to design games. Unfortunately, currently academia either comes at them from the computer science/coding aspect or from the art aspect. The treatment of games as a discipline unto itself, as you know better than I, is virtually unknown.
Getting a book out there that is written for the market you describe that would help them understand the process of game design is really important right now.
I understand why your potential publisher wants you to write a library book. This is a tempting market. Libraries buy lots of books even if there is no real market for them. This means it will be profitable for the publisher and you will make a little cash.
And have almost no influence.
Unless you believe that your target audience is hanging out in libraries, the chances that they will find and read your book are modest at best.
I would, instead, recommend a publishing model that O'Reilly (have you approached them, by the way?) has used successfully in the past. Put the book in PDF form and give it away for free but give readers an option to buy a POD version.
First, traditionally published nonfiction books make very little money for their authors. Writing for libraries reduces the risk of making nothing but virtually ensures that you will only make a modest amount and guarantees that your already niche book will have a even more limited market.
Second, giving it away for free in PDF format in a market that does not have any real competition, means that it will become very popular. If your goal is to get something useful in the hands of those who are interested rather than to make money, this is the way to do it.
Third, you will convert some of those free downloads to paying for print. Reference books are not like games. Once you realize the value of a book, there is an instinctive desire to have a hard copy for reference and portability.
Fourth, the money you make from POD will be all yours -- no splits with the publishers.
Fifth, even if you don't sell a copy, you will have accomplished your larger goal of writing what you want for an audience you think needs/wants it.
Finally, the free book will inevitably lead to lecture and other opportunities where you may be able to make some real money.
Sorry this went on so long. I have some experience with this myself (in another discipline) and have recently been looking for exactly the kind of book you describe for my son.
I wish you luck!
Kris
I, too, prefer Get it Done; the idea of the outline is a reference-style book, and libraries are not a bad target for that purpose, in fact may be the best target.
There are publishers experimenting with give-away schemes (have to check into O'Reilly), or I could just go to straight POD.
The kicker in book publishing is that any decent book becomes available on Bit-torrent soon after publication, in effect becoming free to those who are willing to pirate (which is a very large percentage of millennials, 79% of 20-30,000 Kotaku readers have pirated PC games).
I have no data of any kind about whether people who obtain an electronic copy of a book will then buy a POD version. I know that people who play online versions of boardgames will sometimes purchase the actual game, but boardgames are group activities, books are solitary.
Post a Comment